Hub
Pricing About
WorkflowWorkflow

Benchmark Pokemon API

ekadagami profile image
Version1.0Latest, created on 
Jul 30, 2024 6:47 AM
Drag & drop
Like
Download workflow
Workflow preview

Pokemon API Performance Comparison

Overview

This project aims to compare the performance of three different methods for fetching data from the Pokemon API: asynchronous, threaded, and sequential approaches. The goal is to determine which method is most efficient for retrieving data for multiple Pokemon.

Methods

1. Asynchronous: Using Python's `asyncio` and `aiohttp` libraries to make concurrent API requests.

2. Threaded: Utilizing Python's `ThreadPoolExecutor` to parallelize API requests.

3. Sequential: Making API requests one after another in a simple loop.

Measurement Purpose

The primary purpose of the measurement is to quantify and compare the total execution time (absolute time) for each method when fetching data for the same set of Pokemon. This comparison helps in understanding:

1. Efficiency: Which method completes the task in the least amount of time?

2. Scalability: How does each method perform as the number of Pokemon increases?

3. Resource Utilization: Indirectly, we can infer how each method utilizes system resources (CPU, network I/O).

Significance

- Performance Optimization: Identifying the fastest method can lead to optimized data retrieval processes, especially important for larger datasets.

- Resource Management: Understanding which approach uses resources most efficiently can inform better system design and resource allocation.

- API Interaction Strategies: The results can guide developers in choosing the best strategy for interacting with APIs, particularly when dealing with multiple requests.

Output

Each script outputs a single value: the absolute time taken to complete all API requests. This allows for direct comparison between the three methods.

Potential Applications

- Improving response times in applications that interact with external APIs

- Optimizing data collection processes for large datasets

- Informing best practices for API interaction in Python projects

By comparing these three methods, we can gain valuable insights into the most effective way to handle multiple API requests in Python, specifically within the KNIME analytics platform environment.

Loading deploymentsLoading ad hoc jobs

Used extensions & nodes

Created with KNIME Analytics Platform version 5.3.0
  • Go to item
    KNIME Base nodesTrusted extension

    KNIME AG, Zurich, Switzerland

    Version 5.3.0

    knime
  • Go to item
    KNIME Data GenerationTrusted extension

    KNIME AG, Zurich, Switzerland

    Version 5.3.0

    knime
  • Go to item
    KNIME Python IntegrationTrusted extension

    KNIME AG, Zurich, Switzerland

    Version 5.3.0

    knime
  • Go to item
    KNIME ViewsTrusted extension

    KNIME AG, Zurich, Switzerland

    Version 5.3.0

    knime

Legal

By using or downloading the workflow, you agree to our terms and conditions.

KNIME
Open for Innovation

KNIME AG
Talacker 50
8001 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Software
  • Getting started
  • Documentation
  • Courses + Certification
  • Solutions
  • KNIME Hub
  • KNIME Forum
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Partner
  • Developers
  • KNIME Home
  • Careers
  • Contact us
Download KNIME Analytics Platform Read more about KNIME Business Hub
© 2025 KNIME AG. All rights reserved.
  • Trademarks
  • Imprint
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Credits